Affiliation:
1. izmir bakırçay üniversitesi
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impact of the trade openness of selected OECD countries on entrepreneurship. There is a general acceptance that the impact of the trade openness of economies on entrepreneurship is positive. In the analysis process, econometric modeling studies were carried out based on the data of the selected OECD countries for the 2006-2020 period. The quantile panel regression technique was used to test the impact of trade openness on entrepreneurship. The quantile panel regression analyses have been carried out with an approach that considers the asymmetric situation between the selected OECD countries. Hence, this approach has been a contribution to the literature. Policy recommendations are presented within the framework of empirical findings. According to the empirical findings, entrepreneurship activities are important in terms of increasing economic performance in the selected OECD countries and show that policies should be implemented in support of entrepreneurship activities. The necessity of considering the impact of the trade openness level on entrepreneurship in determining policies has been revealed. In particular, the fact that the economies assess this issue in the policy development process can be considered a strategic instrument.
Reference54 articles.
1. Abrevaya, J. and C. M. Dahl (2008). The effects of birth inputs on birthweight: Evidence from quantile estimation on panel data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 26, 379– 97.
2. Altınışık, İ., and Külen, C. (2020). Girişimcilik Kültürü Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Teorik Bir Değerlendirme. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship Culture and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Evaluation. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research. 22(39), 277-290.
3. Amin, A, RU Khan and A Maqsood (2021). Financial development, entrepreneurship and financial openness: Evidence from Asia. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, doi:10.1108/JEAS-05-2021-0080. Baltagi, B. H. (2013). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 5th ed. New York: Wiley.
4. Bersvendsen Tore and Ditzen Jan (2021). Testing for slope heterogeneity in Stata. The Stata Journal, 21, Number 1, pp. 51–80. DOI: 10.1177/1536867X211000004.
5. Blomquist, J., and J. Westerlund. (2013). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation. Economics Letters 121: 374–378. https://doi.org /10.1016/ j. econlet.2013.09.012.