A Review on Media Tradition and Realities in Natural Disasters

Author:

MA. Dr.M.R. Prakash1

Affiliation:

1. M.Com., B.Ed., MBA., M.Phil., Ph.D., FSIESRP(Malaysia)., HOD & Assistant Professor PG Department of Commerce-Bank Management Mohamed Sathak College of Arts &Science Sholingallur Chennai-600119

Abstract

The paper surveys how the media has added to battling normal perils. An essential goal of the examination is to centre the associations, pressures and territories of bargains of media amid common fiascos highlighted inside the late writing. The article focuses on three areas: (1) media response to routine disasters; (2) media fallacies about disaster casualties; and (3) media role as a partner or weight group in routine disasters. Focusing on these three angles, the available material reveals that the media coverage of disaster events has a lasting impact on the minds and spirits of the populace and may effectively urge people to assist or can result in feedback of the situation. The media occasionally plays a significant role in spreading false beliefs about disaster victims, characterising them as either defenceless or raiders. Since they are there to gather direct and limited catastrophe data as an aware to provide in the open commercial sector of a group of observers, the media may give weight to their reports rather than spare or save casualties and survivors.

Publisher

HM Publishers

Reference7 articles.

1. Lee, M. (2008). Media relations and external communications during a disaster: Boca Raton:CRC Press.

2. Pew. (2005 ). The Pew Research Centerfor the People and the Press.

3. Fernando, J. (2010). Media in Disaster vs Media Disasters Anthropology News.

4. Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change Part A, 15(4), 338-352. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003

5. Murray, R., & Heumann, J. (2007). Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth and its skeptics: a case of environmental nostalgia. Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, 49.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3