Author:
Al Edani Dr. Ali Abdulhussein Sabri,Hassan Dr. Adil Abdulmajeed,Ahmed Al-Jumaili Dr. Waleed Khalid
Abstract
Background: One of the most prevalent conditions in children and young adults is an inguinal hernia. For full-term and preterm newborns, the estimated prevalence rates of inguinal hernia are 1-5% and 9-11%, correspondingly.
Aim: This paper aims to analyse a cross-sectional study to detect the findings of hernial repair procedure in Iraqi children.
Patients and methods: This paper was conducted in different hospitals in Iraq from 15th September 2021 to 17th December 2021 as a cross-sectional study to analyse cross-sectional study to detect the findings of hernia in Iraqi children. This study was contained 54 patients, which separate into two kinds of groups. Where the first group have included 27 patients who conduct open surgery, while the second group have 27 patients where present patients who did laparoscopic surgery. The databases collected were analysed and plotted by the SPSS program.
Results and Discussion: In this study, we examine the results of two techniques for hernia repair in young girls and boys. The results showed that although laparoscopic surgery and open surgery had differently post-operative problems, open surgery required less time to complete an inguinal hernia repair in patients than laparoscopic surgery did.
Conclusion: The results of our investigation generally showed that, despite the near proximity of the two repair procedures' preoperative and postoperative complications. However, herniotomy opening surgery took somewhat less time to complete than laparoscopic surgery when safety for hernia repair in children under the age of six was considered.
Reference23 articles.
1. Levitt MA, Ferraraccio D, Arbesman MC, Brisseau GF, Caty MG, Glick PL. Variability of inguinal hernia surgical technique: A survey of North American pediatric surgeons. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:745-51.
2. Jabłoński J, Bajon K, Gawrońska R. Long-term effects of operative treatment of inguinal hernias in children comparison of different techniques. Przegl Pediatr 2007;37:44-7.
3. Kurlan MZ, Wels PB, Piedad OH. Inguinal herniorrhaphy by the Mitchell Banks technique. J Pediatr Surg 1972;7:427-9.
4. Summers JE. Inguinal herniorrhaphy; methods of repair in use at the present time. Am J Surg 1950;80:540-4.
5. Rescorla FJ, Grosfeld JL. Inguinal hernia repair in the perinatal period and early infancy: Clinical considerations. J Pediatr Surg 1984;19:832-7.