Understanding the Biomechanics of Musculoskeletal Injuries in High-Risk Environmental Conditions
-
Published:2024-07-16
Issue:44
Volume:
Page:35-50
-
ISSN:2799-1210
-
Container-title:Journal of Nursing Research,Patient Safety and Practise
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JNRPSP
Author:
Ogom Collins Molua Ogom,Ukpene Anthony Ossai
Abstract
The present study examines the biomechanics of musculoskeletal injuries in high-risk environmental conditions by thoroughly analyzing diverse data sources and employing various methodologies. This study utilizes motion analysis, force sensor measurements, computer simulations, and biomechanical testing to examine the various factors contributing to musculoskeletal injuries. The analysis of motion indicates that specific tests, namely varus test, impose considerably greater biomechanical stress, thereby emphasizing their susceptibility to causing injuries. The force sensor data reveals that pressure mapping system is responsible for exerting the highest force, raising concerns regarding its potential impact on the risk of injury. According to computer simulations, various injury risks are associated with different conditions, with load carriage exhibiting the highest risk. The analysis of joint stability during biomechanical testing reveals discrepancies in joint stability levels across different tasks. Outliers within the dataset highlight tasks that exhibit notable concerns regarding joint stability. Moreover, supplementary motion analysis data about various task variants, such as Sulcus sign and vasus stress test unveils distinct variations that lead to heightened levels of biomechanical stress. The discoveries mentioned above offer valuable perspectives on the biomechanical foundations of musculoskeletal injuries in environments with elevated risk levels. The aforementioned findings emphasize the necessity of implementing focused interventions, enhancing equipment design, and implementing heightened safety measures to reduce the risks of injury effectively. The present study establishes a fundamental basis for subsequent research endeavors and proposes approaches designed to safeguard the welfare of individuals operating in demanding contexts.
Reference30 articles.
1. Aaron, K., Vaughan, J., Gupta, R., Ali, N., Beth, A., Moore, J., Ma, Y., Ahmad, I., Jackler, R., & Vaisbuch, Y. (2021). The risk of ergonomic injury across surgical specialties. PLoS One, 16(2). 2. Åkerstedt, T., Axelsson, J., Lekander, M., Orsini, N., & Kecklund, G. (2014). Do sleep, stress, and illness explain daily variations in fatigue? A prospective study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 76(4), 280-285. 3. Ataria, Y. (2015). Trauma from an enactive perspective: The collapse of the knowing-how structure. Adaptive Behavior, 23, 143-154. 4. Attarian, A., & Siderelis, C. (2013). Injuries in commercial whitewater rafting on the New and Gauley rivers of West Virginia. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, 24(4), 309-314. 5. Avedesian, J., Forbes, W., Covassin, T., & Dufek, J. (2021). Influence of cognitive performance on musculoskeletal injury risk: A systematic review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 50, 554-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546521998081
|
|