Investigation of Dentinal Tubule Occlusion by a Desensitizing Dentifrice: an in-Vitro Sem Analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Investigation of Dentinal Tubule Occlusion by a Desensitizing Dentifrice: an in-Vitro Sem Analysis

Published:2023-06-29 Issue:34 Volume: Page:11-16
ISSN:2799-1210
Container-title:Journal of Nursing Research,Patient Safety and Practise
language:en
Short-container-title:JNRPSP

Author:

Johnson Lynn,Pillai Sonal GP,Upadhyay Palak

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare patent dentin tubules to in vitro dentin tubules in order to assess the dentin tubule occluding impact of a dentifrice incorporating Pro-Argin Technology (Colgate Sensitive Plus). Methods: The diameter of the dentine tubule was measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on 20 produced dentin discs that were either left untreated or treated with the dentifrice. To evaluate tubule patency, microphotographs were obtained at a 2000x magnification. The dentifrice covered the treated sample, filling the dentinal tubule and decreasing or closing the tubule opening, according to SEM imaging results. Conclusion: According to pertinent statistical analysis, Pro-argin technology efficiently blocked dentinal tubules, making it suitable for use as a dental anti-sensitivity agent.

Publisher

HM Publishers

Reference17 articles.

1. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R (1997) Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 24:808–813 Acharya AB, Chandrashekar A, Thakur S. A short term comparative evaluation of the efficacy of diode laser with desensitizing toothpastes and mouthwashes in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022; 14(3):e229-34.

2. Khare K, Bhusari P, Soni A, Malagi SK, Abraham D, Johnson L. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of BioMin F and propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without use of an adjunct 810 nm diode laser: An In vitro scanning electron microscope study. J Microsc Ultrastruct 2023; 11:41-6.

3. Splieth CH, Tachou A. Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-8. doi: 10.1007/ s00784-012-0889-8 Zhuang H, Liang Y, Xiang S, Li H, Dai X, Zhao W. Dentinal tubule occlusion using Er:YAG Laser: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2021 Apr 2; 29:e20200266. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020- 0266. PMID: 33825761; PMCID: PMC9648964.

4. Pashley DH (1994) Dentine permeability and its role in the pathobiology of dentine sensitivity. Arch Oral Biol 39:73–80 Rimondini L, Baroni C, Carrassi A (1995) Ultrastructure of hypersensitive and non-sensitive dentine. A study on replica models. J Clin Periodontol 22:899–902.

5. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D (1987) Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and nonsensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol 14:280–284.