Abstract
The purpose of this exploratory qualitative study was to determine the factors and conditions that intervene in the implementation of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) in diverse Colombian educational contexts. This study was conducted at five private schools from different cities and towns in the country (Bogotá, Chía, Tenjo, Facatativá, and Girardot). Data was collected from three sources (interviews, questionnaires, and field journals). Data analysis procedures included the use of triangulation and validation procedures through the grounded theory approach. Findings revealed that teachers still have complications understanding CLIL as an approach that goes beyond the mere usage of the target language in content. Instead, the study advocates for the inclusion of essential lifelong skills (i.e. creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication) when implementing CLIL in the classroom. Results also indicated that staged lesson planning is scarce, and that teachers’ practices still emphasize the scope and sequence plan provided by the textbook used in the institutions. Hence, the study supports the design and implementation of CLIL professional development programs that through scaffolding can assist teachers in viewing and situatuating CLIL as a dialogic pedagogical approach. Not only does the approach help teachers make use of their existing knowledge of CLIL, but also helps them materialize ways through which language and content can be integrated. It does so by making use of students’ primary knowledge and mapping achievable routes for effective educational enrichment not restricted to language and content classrooms but expanded into other formal and non-formal learning contexts.
Key words: CLIL, professional development, CLIL planning, lifelong learning.
Publisher
Institucion Universitaria Colombo Americana - UNICA
Reference61 articles.
1. Assessment in CLIL classes;Babocká;In S et al Pokrivčáková (Ed ) CLIL in foreign language Education E-textbook for foreign language teachers (pp 176-188) Nitra Constantine the Philosopher University Retrieved from https//educ tedu edu tr/sites/default/files/content_files/research_files/e-textbook_clil_in_fle_-_final2,2015
2. Banegas, D. L. (2014). An investigation into CLIL-related sections of EFL coursebooks: Issues of CLIL inclusion in the publishing market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(3), 345-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.793651
3. Biçaku, R. Ç. /. (2011). CLIL and teacher training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3821-3825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.379
4. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cambridge, U. of. (2011). Using the CEFR: Principles of good practice. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/126011-using-cefr-principles-of-good-practice.pdf
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献