Linear and volumetric shrinkage displacements of resin composite restorations with and without debonding-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Linear and volumetric shrinkage displacements of resin composite restorations with and without debonding

Published:2023-09-25 Issue:5 Volume:42 Page:659-668
ISSN:0287-4547
Container-title:Dental Materials Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Dent. Mater. J.

Author:

GHANI Siti Mariam AB¹,HASSAN Mohamed Ibrahim ABU¹,ABDULLAH Abdul Halim²,GHANI Amir Radzi AB²,IZRA’AI Saiful Islam²,AREGAWI Wondwosen³,CHEW Hooi Pin³,FOK Alex³

Affiliation:

1. Center for Restorative Dentistry Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA

2. School of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA

3. Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, University of Minnesota

Publisher

Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices

Subject

General Dentistry,Ceramics and Composites

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dmj/42/5/42_2023-023/_pdf

Reference47 articles.

1. 1) Ab Ghani S, Tengku Mohd Ariff T, Ong T, Lim T. The implementation of the minimal intervention dentistry in the undergraduate dental clinical teaching: A retrospective audit. Compend Oral Sci 2022; 9: 63-68.

2. 2) Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 1043-1050.

3. 3) Hurst D. Amalgam or composite fillings —Which material lasts longer? Evid Based Dent 2014; 15: 50-51.

4. 4) Burke F, Wilson N, Cheung S, Mjör I. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001; 29: 317-324.

5. 5) Heck K, Manhart J, Hickel R, Diegritz C. Clinical evaluation of the bulk fill composite QuiXfil in molar class I and II cavities: 10-year results of a RCT. Dent Mater 2018; 34: 138-147.