Legal Governance in HTA: Environment, Health and Safety Issues / Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (EHSI/ELSI), the Ongoing Debate

Author:

Bernier Louise1,Legault Georges-Auguste2,Daniel Charles-Étienne2,K.-Bédard Suzanne3,Béland Jean-Pierre4,Bellemare Christian A.3,Dagenais Pierre5,Gagnon Hubert6,Parent Monelle6,Patenaude Johane7

Affiliation:

1. Faculté de droit, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

2. Faculté de droit; Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT) de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

3. Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l’Estrie – Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Sherbrooke (CHUS); Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT) de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

4. Unité d’enseignement en éthique, Département des sciences humaines, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT) de l’Université de Sherbrooke; Chicoutimi, Canada

5. Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l’Estrie – Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Sherbrooke (CHUS); Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé de l’Université de Sherbrooke; Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT) de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

6. Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT) de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

7. Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé; Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT) de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the law circumscribing the social role of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and gain insight into the reasons challenging the inclusion of ethics into HTA. We focused on a debate at the core of the perceived role of regulatory law in health technology development, namely: Environment, Health and Safety Issues (EHSI) vs Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (ELSI) that arose in technology governance. Data collection was based on a literature review and a case study analysis. The former was founded on previous work. Three HTA agencies were selected for the latter using categories ranging from a greater to a lesser level of legal obligatory intensity. Our literature review revealed five different themes relating to the social role of HTA and a distinction between the role/use of “hard law” and “soft law” in regulatory law, thus providing an understanding of how agencies used law for handling ethics in HTA. Both approaches revealed that the debate, first observed in the EHSI/ELSI technology-governance and assessment, is reproduced in HTA. The main trend revealed by the literature review and the case study, is the presence of a pact between science and regulatory law. The social demand for integrating ELSI, and more precisely, ethical evaluation into HTA, is not the main preoccupation of the traditional legal frameworks governing HTA and remains to be considered primarily by alternative, soft law initiatives. The reported difficulties in integrating ethics into HTA demonstrate the need for rethinking legal governance in HTA.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Health (social science)

Reference69 articles.

1. 1Patenaude J, Legault G-A, Bernier L, Beauvais J, Béland J-P, Boissy P, et al. Framework for the analysis of nanotechnologies’ impacts and ethical acceptability: basis of an interdisciplinary approach to assessing novel technologies. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015;21(2):293–315.

2. 2Legault GA, Verchères C, Patenaude J. Support for the development of technological innovations: promoting responsible social uses. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:529–49.

3. 3WHO. Health Technology Assessment. 2019.

4. 4International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Results of the survey on Ethical Issues among INAHTA organizations [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.inahta.org/hta-tools-resources/inahta-member-surveys

5. 5European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). Joint Action 2, Work Package 8: HTA Core Model, v.3. [Internet]. 2016. Available from: www.htacoremodel.info/BrowseModel.aspx

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3