Author:
Fettah Sami,Vallery Gérard
Abstract
<p>In a society where workers are using psychoactive substances in their workplace, what type of prevention can we propose in order to limit the risks? The aim of this research is to contribute to the improvement of current prevention systems. This work is grounded within an Inter-company Occupational Health and Prevention Service (IOHPS). Data were collected during four prevention interventions in companies affiliated with the service. These interventions were documented to assist in the development of new collective and primary prevention approaches for substance use in the workplace. Developing preventive actions in the workplace requires collective and multidisciplinary collaboration between occupational health professionals and company stakeholders. Based on studies conducted on the analysis of mental health interventions in the workplace, our results confirmed the importance of the five essential conditions that facilitate the development of actions highlighted by Rouat (Rouat, 2010; Rouat et al., 2021). They also identified two additional conditions: the establishment of a common set of representations and the preexistence of a framework that facilitates prevention. We have identified a set of factors that can constrain these interventions. Thus, performance-driven approaches to occupational health, lack of support in implementing interdisciplinary projects, or the digitalization of relationships between occupational health stakeholders can influence the success of substance use prevention projects. Given that addictive behaviours intersect personal and professional spheres, we emphasize the importance of applying occupational and organizational psychology principles in this area of intervention.</p>
Reference48 articles.
1. Althaus, V. et Brangier, E. (2019). L’intervention. Dans G. Valléry, B. M. Chaumon, E. Brangier et M. Dubois (éd.), Psychologie du travail et des organisations : 110 notions clés (2e éd), Dunod. p. 265-269.
2. ANSM. (2017, 23 mai). Rapport Benzodiazépines. Addictovigilance Paris. http://addictovigilance.aphp.fr/2017/05/23/ansm-rapport-benzodiazepines/#:%7E:text=Des%20donn%C3%A9es%20de%20l%27Assurance,des%20anxiolytiques%20(-3.8%25).
3. Battaglia, N., et Décamps, G. (2010). Psychologie des conduites addictives. Psychologie Française, 55(4), 259-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2010.10.002
4. Bobillier-Chaumon, M., Brangier, É., Dubois, M., et Guiné, A. (2019). Introduction à la psychologie du travail et des organisations. Aperçu sur les fondements et les domaines d’interventions. Dans G. Valléry, B. M. Chaumon, E. Brangier et M. Dubois (éd.), Psychologie du travail et des organisations : 110 notions clés (2e éd., p. 7-17). Dunod. https://doi.org/10.3917/dunod.valle.2019.01.0007
5. Bolton, D. (2020). Le modèle biopsychosocial et le nouvel humanisme médical. Archives de Philosophie, 83, 13-40. https://doi.org/10.3917/aphi.834.0013