Abstract
The way in which Marshall McLuhan’s theories relate to teaching and learning broadly has garnered scholarly attention. It is surprising, though, given his impact on Schafer and others, that there is scant critical commentary on the implications of McLuhan’s theories for either mass music or higher music education. The present study is a step towards redressing this gap. The study concludes that McLuhan’s iconoclastic views have direct bearing on formal learning environments, like music schools, that struggle with notions of inclusivity and exclusivity, community music and concert music, improvisation and textual interpretation, even as they embrace timely and sweeping curricular reform.
Reference32 articles.
1. Adams, Stephen. 1983. R. Murray Schafer. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
2. Black, David. 2010. “McLuhan the Teacher.” English Studies in Canada 36 (2/3): 24–26.
3. Carey, James W. (1967) 1969. “Harold Adams Innis and Marshall McLuhan.” Originally published in Antioch Review 27 (1). Reprinted in McLuhan Pro and Con, edited by Raymond Rosenthal, 270–308. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
4. Carruthers, Glen. 2008. “Musical Interpretation and ‘The Historical Imagination.’” Paper presented to the American Musicological Society Midwest Chapter, National–Louis University, Chicago, 4 October.
5. Carruthers, Glen. 2009a. “Engaging Music and Media: Technology as a Universal Language.” Research & Issues in Music Education 7 (1). http://www.stthomas.edu/rimeonline/vol7/carruthers.htm.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献