Affiliation:
1. Ryerson University
2. Delmore Buddy Daye Learning Institute
Abstract
Increasing evidence shows that punitive discipline is ineffective and detrimental. Using empowerment theory and the opportunity-to-learn conceptual framework, this literature review seeks to broaden school personnel’s knowledge of alternative discipline interventions. Searching ERIC and JSTOR databases, we looked for English language, North American literature published between 1996 and 2016 that discussed alternative individual and school-wide disciplinary approaches. The literature we found indicates that punitive measures are counter-productive; that several alternative disciplinary models share common principles; and that studies point to favourable outcomes of some alternative school discipline models. While the transition towards alternative discipline may require additional resources and years of adjustment, a healthier school climate can foster the empowerment and academic achievement of marginalized students.
Reference72 articles.
1. Andrews, S. P., Taylor, P. B., Martin, E. P., & Slate, J. R. (1998). Evaluation of an alternative discipline program. The High School Journal, 81(4), 209-217.
2. Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887-907.
3. Baumrind, D. (1996). The discipline controversy revisited. Family Relations, 45(4), 405-414.
4. Bear, G. (2011). Positive psychology and school discipline: Positive is not simply the opposite of punitive. Communiqué, 39(5), 8-9.
5. Beckford, C. (2016). Connecting the dots through a case report: A child’s unmet needs, neuropsychological impairment and entrance into the juvenile justice system. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 15(3), 188-209.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献