Affiliation:
1. Professor, Salford Business School, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
2. Professor, Department of Psychology, National Chenchi University, Taipei City, Taiwan
3. Department of Psychology, National Chenchi University, Taipei City, Taiwan
4. Applied Psychology, University of Cumbria, Fusehill Street, Carlisle, UK
Abstract
Considerable theory and research has revealed that organizational identification (OID) benefits individuals and groups and that OID facilitates the development of long-term commitment and support towards an organization. Prior studies have highlighted the importance of an identification mechanism in the workplace, i.e., how employees define their self-concepts vis-à-vis their connections with their organizations. In contrast to previous research, we explore the process by which employees divorce their identity from that of their organization, i.e., defining who they are by what they are not. Interestingly, how individuals dis-identify themselves from the organization still remains unclear, and the concept of dis-identification in organization (DiO) has not drawn much academic attention. The paucity of research in this area leaves theories under-developed; thus, our research seeks to shed new light on the concept of DiO and understand its importance at work.
An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted, recruiting 304 employees across eight organizations in Taiwan. Different from prior studies, this research stated that OID and DiO were neither heterogeneous nor independent constructs. Statistical evidence affirmed this statement further and explained that OID and DiO were inter-related constructs. Moreover, two DiO antecedents were discovered, including: person-organization fit and abusive supervision. Unlike in previous studies, DiO was not correlated with poor employee performance; rather, it was correlated with workplace deviance, an intention of quitting the job, and voice-extra-role-behaviour.
Organizations are complex entities by their very nature. Whether an organization can continue, function and succeed may depend upon a series of organizational characteristics. An organization is like a social arrangement that pursues collective goals, controls its own performance, and has a boundary separating it from its environment. One such organizational characteristic is identification. With a better understanding of OID/DiO, managers and HR practitioners can better observe the influence of OID/DiO and develop policies to increase employees’ identification and decrease dis-identification. Ultimately, employers, employees and society will enjoy the benefits of better organizations, e.g., higher working morale, more performance output, stronger membership/cohesion, and lower turnover.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference59 articles.
1. Abrams, D. 1996. “Social Identity, Self as Structure and Self as Process.” Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henry Tajfel. P. Robinson, ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 143-169.
2. Aiken, L. S., and S. G. West. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury: Sage.
3. Ando, K. 1999. “Social Identification and A Solution to Social Dilemmas.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 227-235.
4. Ashforth, B. E. 2001. Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
5. Ashforth, B. E., and F. A. Mael. 1998. “The Power of Resistance: Sustaining Valued Identities.” Power and Influence in Organizations. R. M. Kramer and M. A. Neale, eds. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 89-119.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献