Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University
2. University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeandUniversity of Birmingham
3. Rutgers University
Abstract
Using the postal service as an example, this article highlights the critical role played by a series of “implicit” judgments when estimating the government earnings differential. Regression estimates demonstrate that alternative treatments of location, gender, industry, occupation and union status result in estimates ranging from a double digit advantage for postal workers to no advantage at all. We argue that the standard of comparability, comparing similar workers doing similar work, requires that judgments about samples and controls be made explicit as they largely determine the resulting estimates.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference59 articles.
1. Addison, J. and B. Hirsch. 1989. “Unions Effects on Productivity, Profits and Growth: Has the Long Run Arrived?” Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 72–105.
2. Asher, M. and J. Popkin. 1984. “The Effect of Gender and Race Differentials on Public-Private Wage Comparisons: A Study of Postal Workers.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 16–25.
3. Belman, D. 1988. “Concentration, Unionism, and Labor Earnings: A Sample Selection Approach.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, No. 3, 391–397.
4. Belman, D. 1992. “Unions, Industrial Relations Climate, and Firm Performance.” Unions and Economic Competitiveness. P. Voos and L. Mishel, eds. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.
5. Belman, D. and E. Groshen. 1998. “Is Small Beautiful for Employees?” Small Consolation: The Dubious Benefits of Small Business for Job Growth and Wages. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, 3–58.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献