Affiliation:
1. Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages of Canada
2. Commissariat aux langues officielles du Canada
Abstract
Changes to the political landscape have revived the debate over linguistic duality. That debate, however, is not altogether new. Many of the arguments being made in 2019, upon the fiftieth anniversary of the Official Languages Act, were not unlike those of 1969, when Canada adopted the Act, or even 1929, when government took modest measures to recognize English and French at the post office.
In 1929, 1969 and 2019, some believed that pan-Canadian recognition of linguistic duality would serve national unity. Others, however, wondered whether it was compatible with the ethnocultural diversity of the country, or asserted that federal bilingualism in their province was not justified, citing populist, demographic or identity-based arguments. The debate—90 years ago, 50 years ago, or even today—has often given rise to fear and misunderstanding; however, it has also benefited from the persistence of moderates from both of Canada’s official language communities.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Abley, Mark (2018). Beyond bilingualism: The Official Languages Act will soon turn fifty. Have we outgrown it? The Walrus.
2. Calgary Albertan (1968, November 2). Cited in La Presse, “Sans dualité linguistique, le Canada pourrait cesser d’exister,” p. 4.
3. Charbonneau, François (2015). “Un dialogue de sourds ? Les arguments invoqués par les défenseurs et les détracteurs du bilinguisme dans l’espace public anglo-canadien”, Linguistic Minorities and Society = Minorités linguistiques et société, no 5, p. 13–57. doi.org/10.7202/1029106ar
4. Choinière, Frédéric, & Simon Madore (2019). Bi* – Bilinguisme, la grande utopie canadienne [Documentary], Radio-Canada. https://ici.tou.tv/bi-bilinguisme-la-grande-utopie-canadienne
5. Dix, Pauline. (1969, 16 February). Letter to the editor, The Globe and Mail, p. 6.