Going the Extra Mile: Managers and Supervisors as Moral Agents for Workers with Disability at Two Social Enterprises

Author:

Bartram Timothy1,Cavanagh Jillian2,Sim Stephen3,Pariona-Cabrera Patricia4,Meacham Hannah5

Affiliation:

1. Professor, School of Management, College of Business, RMIT, Melbourne, Victoria

2. Senior Lecturer, Business School, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, Victoria

3. Senior Lecturer, Business School, Curtin University, Malaysia

4. Student, School of Management, College of Business, RMIT, Melbourne, Victoria

5. Lecturer, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria

Abstract

This study examines the ethical management of workers with disability (WWD) employed at two social enterprises in Australia. Viewed largely through the spectrum of institutionally-based conflict in the employment relationship, this research draws on a framework of situated moral agency (Wilcox, 2012) to establish the ways in which WWD are afforded opportunities to engage in work and how managers and supervisors practise situated moral agency at the workplace. A qualitative case study approach is used with 62 participants through semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Key findings demonstrate supervisors constantly have to reshape and reinterpret human resource management (HRM) policies and practices to exercise and extend moral agency. This phenomenon suggests contradictions between moral agency and ethical management practice within current HRM regimes. The key message of the paper is that HRM does not always support the ethical management of WWD. Consequently, we question the ethical nature of contemporary HRM policy and practice for WWD, and argue for further research to unpack ethical ways to more effectively support WWD in the workplace. For WWD to be included at work, achieve life skills and their goals, managers and supervisors need to engage with their moral agency. Finally, we draw implications for management and employment relations theory and practice.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference49 articles.

1. Australian Department of Human Services (2017) Accessibility Plan 2013-2017. https://www.ndis.gov.au/document/our-accessibility-action-plan-2013-20172017.

2. Beadle, Ron and Geoff Moore (2006) “MacIntyre on Virtue and Organization.” Organization Studies, 27 (3), 323-340.

3. Bandura, Albert, ed. (1991) Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action (Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

4. Bandura, Albert (2001) “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.”Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (1), 1-26.

5. Bandura, Albert (2002) “Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency.” Journal of Moral Education, 31 (2), 101-120.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3