From adoption to assisted reproduction : frameworks, practices and issues surrounding the question of origins and its narratives

Author:

Martial Agnès1,Côté Isabel2,Lavoie Kévin3,Baslyk Valentina

Affiliation:

1. Co-director, Centre Norbert Elias, Director of Research, French National Centre for Scientific Research, agnes.martial@univ-amu.fr

2. Canada Research Chair on Gestational Surrogacy and Family Ties, Professor, Department of Social Work, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Isabel.cote@uqo.ca

3. Professor, School of Social Work and Criminology, Université Laval, Kevin.Lavoie@tsc.ulaval.ca

Abstract

Research Framework: In a context characterized by new possibilities for parenthood within societies where family structures are becoming increasingly diverse, the issue of knowing one's origins is currently provoking intense political, social and scientific debates. These debates are emblematic of a more general movement that reflects a growing interest in the question of origins within contemporary patterns of family configuration, whether created by adoption or assisted reproduction . The concept of origins is thus a particularly relevant window shedding light on current social and political issues surrounding the future of adoption, the conditions for assisted reproduction through donation, the legislative framework of surrogacy and the application of biogenetic knowledge, as well as an opportunity to analyze contemporary reconfigurations of kinship and family links. Objectives: To identify the primary issues underlying the discourse on personal origins by outlining the context from which it emerged, and by bringing together the various disciplinary approaches to define its parameters. Methodology: This article is based on the various authors' contributions in this issue, as well as on theoretical and empirical studies that show how the concept of origins is used by those involved in adoption and assisted reproduction . The comparative perspective is chosen for this article. Results: The focus on origins reveals a profound evolution linked to the growing dissociation of procreation from kinship, which appear to be leading to the emergence of "new" relationships and actors. The rapid advancement of reproductive technologies is broadening the circumstances, already present in adoption, in which people have children but do not become parents in the legal sense, remaining "at the edges" of kinship. Conclusions: The concept of origins provides a particularly rich field for examining current representations and interpretations of the individuals associated with it (birth "parents" in adoption, egg and sperm donors, women who have carried a child for others), the narratives that shape them, and the place they occupy (or their absence) in the accounts of those who are adopted or are born through surrogacy. Contribution: This article brings a theoretical and heuristic approach to the concept of origins and demonstrates its relevance for examining the multiple relational realities created by current family arrangements. The articles in this issue all contribute to this examination by reflecting in complementary ways on the question of parentage.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Social Psychology

Reference83 articles.

1. Abel, S. et G. Pálsson. 2020. « Dépister l’ancestralité : machines et techniques généalogiques dans la reconstruction des histoires de famille », Ethnologie française, vol. 50, no 2, p. 269-284.

2. Almeling, R. 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm, University of California Press.

3. Allebrandt, D. 2013. Parenté fluide : la quête des origines au Brésil et au Québec. Dialogue entre parenté, droit et science, Thèse de doctorat inédite, Université de Montréal.

4. Black, K. A., A.M. Moyer et A.E. Goldberg. 2016. « From Face-to-Face to Facebook: The Role of Technology and Social Media in Adoptive Family Relationships with Birth Family Members », Adoption Quarterly, vol. 19, no 4, p. 307-332.

5. Brunet, L., J. Carruthers, K. Davaki, D. King, C. Marzo et J. McCandless. 2013. A Comparative Study of the Regime of Surogacy in EU Members States, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs, European Parliament, Bruxelles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3