A Discussion Paper on Indigenous Custom Adoption Part 2: Honouring Our Caretaking Traditions

Author:

di Tomasso Lara1,de Finney Sandrina2

Affiliation:

1. Independent scholar, Ontario, Canada

2. School of Child and Youth Care, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

This paper forms Part 2 of a two-part discussion paper. Part 1 outlined a short history of adoption in Canada, examined the impact of forced, closed, and external adoptions on Indigenous adoptees and families, and traced the move toward more open statutory adoptions and greater cultural continuity in adoptions. Having zeroed in on the entangled histories of adoption and colonization in Part 1, here we explore traditional and contemporary practices of Indigenous custom adoption and caretaking. We first recount Western understandings and impositions, then feature Indigenous perspectives that centre spiritual and ceremonial protocols, values regarding child well-being and community connectedness, and the importance of kinship and customary forms of caretaking. We consider both the promises and complexities involved in designing and implementing custom adoptions, and the urgent need for adequate, equitable funding and supports to ensure their feasibility and sustainability. Finally, we highlight the resurgence of Indigenous authority over child welfare within a context of Indigenous self-determination and self-governance.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Reference37 articles.

1. Arsenault, A. (2006). The life cycle experiences of adoption through Aboriginal adults’ stories. Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from: http://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/17725

2. Atwood, B. A. (2008). Permanency for American Indian and Alaska Native foster children: Taking lessons from tribes. Capital University Law Review. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 08-22.

3. Baldassi, C. L. (2006). The legal status of Aboriginal customary adoption across Canada: Comparisons, contrasts and convergences. UBC Law Review, 39(1), 63–100.

4. Bertsch, M., & Bidgood, B.A. (2010). Why is adoption like a First Nations feast?: Lax Kw’alaam indigenizing adoptions in child welfare. First People’s Child and Family Review, 5(1), 96–105.

5. Borrows, J. (2002). Frozen rights in Canada: Constitutional interpretation and the Trickster. In Recovering Canada: The resurgence of Indigenous law (pp. 56–76). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3