Attitudes towards Faculty Unions and Collective Bargaining in American and Canadian Universities

Author:

Katchanovski Ivan1,Rothman Stanley2,Nevitte Neil3

Affiliation:

1. Part-time Professor, School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Ontario

2. Director, Center for the Study of Social and Political Change, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts

3. Professor, Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

Abstract

This study analyzes attitudes towards faculty unions and collective bargaining among faculty and administrators in the United States and Canada. This is the first study which compares support for unionization and collective bargaining in American and Canadian universities among faculty members and administrators. The main research question is: Which factors are the determinants of attitudes towards faculty unions and collective bargaining in American and Canadian universities and colleges? Our hypotheses are that cultural, institutional, political, positional, socio-economic, and academic factors are significant predictors of support for faculty unionization. The academics in Canada are likely to be more supportive of faculty unionism compared to their American counterparts because of differences in national political cultures. Institutional and political factors are also likely to affect such views. This study uses comparative and regression analyses of data from the 1999 North American Academic Study Survey to examine attitudes towards unions and collective bargaining among faculty and administrators in the United States and Canada. The analysis shows that Canadian academics are more supportive of faculty unions and collective bargaining than their American counterparts. These results provide support to the political culture hypothesis. However, the study shows that institutional, political, positional, socio-economic and academic factors are also important in many cases. A faculty bargaining agent on campus is positively associated with favorable views of faculty unions and collective bargaining among American professors and with administrators’ support for collective bargaining in both countries. Administrators’ opposition is also important, in particular, for attitudes of Canadian faculty. Professors are more pro-union than administrators in both countries. Income, gender, race, age, religion, and academic field, are significant determinants of attitudes of faculty and administrators in the US and Canada in certain cases.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference42 articles.

1. Adams, Michael. 2004. Fire and Ice: The United States, Canada and the Myth of Converging Values. Toronto: Penguin Canada.

2. Akyeampong, Ernest B. 1999. “Unionization: An Update.” Perspectives on Labour and Income, 11 (Autumn), 45-65.

3. Akyeampong, Ernest B. 2000. “Non-unionized but Covered by Collective Agreement.” Perspectives on Labour and Income, 3 (Autumn), 33-59.

4. Alston, Jon P., Theresa M. Morris, and Arnold Vedlitz. 1996. “Comparing Canadian and American Values: New Evidence from National Surveys.” The American Review of Canadian Studies/The Canadian Review of American Studies, 26 (Autumn), 301-314.

5. Benjamin, Ernst. 2006. “Faculty Bargaining.” Academic Collective Bargaining. E. Benjamin and M. Mauer, eds. Washington: AAUP, 23-51.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3