Affiliation:
1. Part-time Professor, School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Ontario
2. Director, Center for the Study of Social and Political Change, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts
3. Professor, Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
Abstract
This study analyzes attitudes towards faculty unions and collective bargaining among faculty and administrators in the United States and Canada. This is the first study which compares support for unionization and collective bargaining in American and Canadian universities among faculty members and administrators. The main research question is: Which factors are the determinants of attitudes towards faculty unions and collective bargaining in American and Canadian universities and colleges?
Our hypotheses are that cultural, institutional, political, positional, socio-economic, and academic factors are significant predictors of support for faculty unionization. The academics in Canada are likely to be more supportive of faculty unionism compared to their American counterparts because of differences in national political cultures. Institutional and political factors are also likely to affect such views. This study uses comparative and regression analyses of data from the 1999 North American Academic Study Survey to examine attitudes towards unions and collective bargaining among faculty and administrators in the United States and Canada.
The analysis shows that Canadian academics are more supportive of faculty unions and collective bargaining than their American counterparts. These results provide support to the political culture hypothesis. However, the study shows that institutional, political, positional, socio-economic and academic factors are also important in many cases. A faculty bargaining agent on campus is positively associated with favorable views of faculty unions and collective bargaining among American professors and with administrators’ support for collective bargaining in both countries. Administrators’ opposition is also important, in particular, for attitudes of Canadian faculty. Professors are more pro-union than administrators in both countries. Income, gender, race, age, religion, and academic field, are significant determinants of attitudes of faculty and administrators in the US and Canada in certain cases.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference42 articles.
1. Adams, Michael. 2004. Fire and Ice: The United States, Canada and the Myth of Converging Values. Toronto: Penguin Canada.
2. Akyeampong, Ernest B. 1999. “Unionization: An Update.” Perspectives on Labour and Income, 11 (Autumn), 45-65.
3. Akyeampong, Ernest B. 2000. “Non-unionized but Covered by Collective Agreement.” Perspectives on Labour and Income, 3 (Autumn), 33-59.
4. Alston, Jon P., Theresa M. Morris, and Arnold Vedlitz. 1996. “Comparing Canadian and American Values: New Evidence from National Surveys.” The American Review of Canadian Studies/The Canadian Review of American Studies, 26 (Autumn), 301-314.
5. Benjamin, Ernst. 2006. “Faculty Bargaining.” Academic Collective Bargaining. E. Benjamin and M. Mauer, eds. Washington: AAUP, 23-51.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献