Affiliation:
1. Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Law School, Renmin University (corresponding author)
2. Professor, Monash Business School, Monash University
Abstract
Research Objective and Questions
We aimed to examine court rulings on disputes between network platforms and labour providers in order to understand the nature of the employment relations and the broader consequences for society as a whole. We addressed two questions :
Methodology
We primarily used secondary data, namely 102 publicly available Court decisions from 2014 to 2019. The case decision reports were downloaded from the Supreme People’s Court “Network of Court Decision Papers.”
Results
Disputes occurred mainly in cities that have the most developed platforms and an independent worker model of employment. They mainly involved network platforms that provide such services as driving, food delivery and courier services. All of the disputes involved road accidents, and over half occurred in Beijing and Shanghai—two leading cities in China that have dense populations. Dispute cases rose sharply, peaked in 2017, started to drop in 2018 and fell even more in 2019. The disputes seem to have educated people on both sides, with the result that more precautions are being taken.
Contributions
Our study makes three contributions. First, we identified three types of platform employment in China, the motives of the platforms in their choice of labour utilization and the legal implications in terms of labour and third-party protection. Second, we examined the attitude and role of the courts in judging disputes between network platforms and labour providers within legal constraints. Third, we propose that socialization of contract service should be central to platform employment.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference55 articles.
1. Aloisi, Antonio (2016) “Commoditized workers. Case study research on labour law issues arising from a set of ‘on-demand/gig economy’ platforms.” Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 37(3), 674–676.
2. Arrêt n°374 du 4 mars 2020 (19-13.316) - Cour de cassation - Chambre sociale (France)
3. Ashford, Susan J, Brianna Barker Caza and Erin M. Reid (2018) “From surviving to thriving in the gig economy : A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work.” Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 23–41.
4. Banakar, Reza and Travers, Max (2005) Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Portland : Hart Publishing.
5. Beesley, Luke (2018) Trade unions (Germany) : Worker power in the platform economy.https://www.europe-solidaire.org/spip.php?article46128. Retrieved on 19th April 2019).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献