Abstract
After considering some ways of assessing argumentation, I present an ethical
assessment of Tuvel's argument in her article “In Defense of Transracialism.” My
claim is that some transgender women engaging with Tuvel are exposed to certain
kinds of injustice associated with argumentational work, namely, disproportionate
burdens and risk of psychological harm.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献