Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas (IIF) - Sociedad de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina
Abstract
The notion of epistemic responsibility applied to memory has been in general examined in the framework of the responsibilities that a collective holds for past injustices, but it has never been the object of an analysis of its own. In this article, I endeavour to isolate and explore it in detail. To this end, I start by conceptualizing the epistemic responsibility applied to individual memories. I conclude that an epistemically responsible individual rememberer is a vigilant agent who knows when to engage in different kinds of mental and nonmental actions in order to monitor and update his or her memories, and who develops and nurtures different kinds of virtuous attitudes that guide those actions. These (epistemic) virtuous attitudes are oriented not only towards oneself but also towards others. Although this conception of epistemic responsibility does not pose a problem for understanding shared memories of family members and friends, it may seem suspicious when applied to large-scale collective memories. These memories, which I name historical memories, are memories of events that have a traumatic impact for the community, are permeated by unequal relations of power, maintain a complex relationship with historical science, and present other characteristics that distinguish them from individual memories. But despite these differences, the analysis undertaken in this work shows that the general principles that govern the epistemic responsibility of individual and (large-scale) collective rememberers are similar, and are based on similar grounds: pragmatic considerations about the consequences of misremembering or forgetting and a feeling of care. The similarities on the individual and collective scale of the epistemically vigilant attitude that is and should be taken toward our significant past may partially justify the use of the same epithet—“memory”—to refer to these different kinds of representations.
Reference69 articles.
1. Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo, La historia de Abuelas: 30 años de búsqueda, 1977–2007. Buenos Aires, 2007, available at https://www.abuelas.org.ar/archivos/publicacion/abuelas30.pdf
2. Anastasio, Thomas J., Kristen Ann Ehrenberger, Patrick Watson, and Wenyi Zhang, Individual and Collective Memory Consolidation: Analogous Processes on Different Levels, MIT Press, 2012.
3. Arango-Muñoz, Santiago, and Kourken Michaelian, “Group Metamemory: Does Collaborative Remembering Imply Group Metacognition?” in Fiebich, Anika (ed.), Minimal Cooperation and Shared Agency, Springer Series, 2020, p. 195-217.
4. Asociación para la Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica, “Qué es la Asociación para la Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica (ARMH)?”, 2015, available at https://memoriahistorica.org.es/que-es-la-asociacion-para-la-recuperacion-de-la-memoria-historica-armh-2000-2012/
5. Assmann, Jan, “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity”, New German Critique, no. 65, 1995, p. 125-133.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献