Decolonizing the Presentation of Research Findings: Amplifying Epistemic Authority Through Poetic Re-Storying

Author:

Raymond Cathy

Abstract

<p>Western-centric epistemologies are often deemed to be more legitimate than non-western ones for driving academic research and knowledge production. As a result, non-western epistemologies are often colonized or silenced during the research process. Decolonizing research practices, such as robust collaboration, mutual respect, mindful listening, and co-constructed interviews offer meaningful opportunities for researchers vested in engaging in research which honors and amplifies a diversity of storied experiences and non-dominant epistemologies. This paper focuses on decolonizing research report writing through poetic re-storying and will include a rationale for and excerpts from a poetic re-storying of research findings from a narrative inquiry project with Parvana, an Afghan woman who until recently was living in Afghanistan; the narrative study is theoretically and conceptually informed by postcolonial feminist theory and the decolonization of research methods. By carefully and collaboratively crafting the research findings in poetic form using original excerpts from open-ended interviews, co-constructed interview conversations, Parvana’s written stories, conversations about artifacts, and other data sources, Parvana and I worked together to amplify and honor her epistemic authority and literacy practices. In addition to presenting the research findings in research participants’ own words, creative re-storying through poetry makes research findings accessible to academic and non-academic audiences alike while also cultivating emotional engagement and empathy.</p>

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Alexander, M.J., & Mohanty, C.T. (1997). Introduction: Genealogies, legacies, movements. In Alexander, M.J. & Mohanty, C.T. (Eds.). Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures (pp. xiii-xlii). Routledge.

2. Azar, B. (2010) Are your findings ‘WEIRD’? Monitor on Psychology: American Psychological Association, 41(5), 11.

3. Bruce, E.M. (2008). Narrative inquiry: A spiritual and liberating approach to research. Religious Education, 103(3), 323-338.

4. Byrne, G. (2017). Narrative inquiry and the problem of representation: ‘Giving voice’, making meaning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(1), 36-52, DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1034097

5. Chowdury, E. (2016). Development paradoxes: Feminist solidarity, alternative imaginaries, and new spaces. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 17(1), 117-132.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3