Abstract
This article explores what it means to include intellectual disability (ID) in philosophical discourse and in the philosophy classroom. Taking Audre Lorde’s claim that “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house” as a starting point, it asks how certain forms of cognitive ableism have excluded ID from the “philosopher’s house.” Drawing upon Michel Foucault’s work as a theoretical framework, part one critically examines the ways that ID has been included, excluded, and constructed within philosophical discourse. Part two then considers what it would mean for ID and people with an ID to be included in the philosophy classroom. It offers some examples of how the work in disability studies, philosophies of disability, and philosophy of art can lead to a more inclusive and transformative pedagogy that will generate new critical questions and expand our philosophical dwelling places.
Reference45 articles.
1. Alcoff, L. (1991). “The problem of speaking for others.” Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32.
2. Alper, M. (2017). Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality. MIT Press.
3. Alperson, P. (2009). “Facing the music: Voices from the margins.” Topoi, 28, 91–96.
4. Arc. (2020). “Applying HHS’s guidance for states and healthcare providers on avoiding disability-based discrimination in treatment rationing.” http://thearc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Guidance-to-States-Hospitals_FINAL.pdf.
5. Bérubé, M. (2016). The secret life of stories: From Don Quixote to Harry Potter, how understanding intellectual disability transforms the way we read. New York University Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献