Author:
Motapanyane Maki,Shankar Irene
Abstract
Leadership positions within post-secondary institutions (PSIs) remain elusive to women generally, and to Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized women in particular. In this paper, we argue that pathways to leadership, particularly for non-traditional, non-normative and critical approaches that can come from the differently situated epistemic positioning of Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized women, are important as beginning steps towards progressively dismantling standardized Eurocentric, androcentric, and corporatized academic workplace cultures. This type of reform is essential preliminary work in the process toward greater equity and inclusivity in academic institutions. Note then that we are writing of a significant amount of substantive change needed to enact crucial initial reform, in tandem with, and beyond which we should continuously push for more radical transformation (Dryden 2022; Patel 2021). As such, we propose initiatives that universities can take to address some of the common gendered, racialized, and class-related exclusions and inequities evident in academic workplaces. This is in acknowledgement that academic institutions, having demonstrated a predilection for the co-optative and performative, are barely able to reform meaningfully, let alone engage the “transformation” and “decolonization” with which reform is often confused and erroneously conflated. Grounded within institutional research, we detail the commitments required from governing bodies, the changes necessary in academic decision-making spaces, the need for timely and transparent data collection infrastructure, and other institutional changes required to enhance the recruitment, hiring, and retention of Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized faculty and academic leaders. Together, these practices constitute preliminary reform necessary to create opportunity for more meaningful practices of inclusion.
Reference78 articles.
1. Abawi, Zuhra E. 2018. “Factors and Processes of Racialization in the Canadian Academe.” Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/Revue canadienne des jeunes chercheures et chercheurs en éducation 9, no.1 (May), 85–95.
2. Academic Women’s Association (AWA). 2019. “U15 Leadership Remains Largely White and Male Despite 33 years of Equity Initiatives.” Accessed May 17, 2022. https://uofaawa.wordpress.com/2019/06/20/u15-leadership-remains-largely-white-and-male-despite-33-years-of-equity-initiatives/
3. Ahmed, Sara. 2012. On Being Included. Durham: Duke University Press.
4. Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.Ahmed, Sara. 2021. Complaint! Durham: Duke University Press. Aiston, Sarah Jane, and Zi Yang. 2017. “‘Absent Data, Absent Women’”: Gender and Higher Education Leadership.” Policy Futures in Education 15, no. 3: 262–74.
5. Alcoff, L. M. 2001. “On Judging Epistemic Credibility: Is Social Identity Relevant?” In Engendering Rationalities, edited by Nancy Tuana and Sandra Morgen, 53–80. Albany: Suny Press.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献