Questioning Autism’s Racializing Assemblages

Author:

Kearl Benjamin1

Affiliation:

1. Purdue University Fort Wayne

Abstract

This article questions the ways autism knowledge is racially assembled. Of specific interest is how clinical and cultural definitions of autism routinely deny the existence of autistics of colour and regularly instantiate autism as a White condition. Employing a contrapuntal reading of autism knowledge, which foregrounds the life-writings of autistics of colour, this article argues that disproportionality and delayed autism diagnoses for children of colour as well as autistic Whiteness habituates autism’s diagnostic space. Not only does this result in the clinical and cultural exclusion of children of colour from autism knowledge, it also hierarchically orders humanity. While autism has received recent philosophical attention from Ian Hacking, this article suggests that Hacking’s historical ontology does not adequately attend to the racializing effects of autism knowledge. As such, this article concludes by gesturing toward the need to re-assemble autism’s diagnostic shape through the invention of collective sites of expression which make possible #BlackAutisticJoy.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Education

Reference56 articles.

1. Adams, D. & Erevelles, N. (2014). Shadow play: Dis/crit, dis/respectability, and carceral logics. In D. Connor, B. Ferri, & S. Annamma (Eds.), DisCrit: Disability Studies and Critical Race Theory in education (pp. 131–18). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

2. Adams, D. & Erevelles, N. (2017). Unexpected spaces of confinement: Aversive technologies, intellectual disability, and “bare life.” Punishment and Society, 19(3), 348–365.

3. Ahmed, S. (2007). A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist Theory, 8(2), 149–168.

4. Anderson, J. L. & Cushing, S. (Eds.). (2013). The philosophy of autism. Lantham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

5. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3