Boundary Conditions: Crossing Spatial Boundaries as a Matter of Mind

Author:

van der Elst Judith1

Affiliation:

1. Independent Scholar

Abstract

A key step in understanding different ways of experiencing the world, consists in exploring the limits of the human mind and the languages we use to make sense of our surrounding worlds. The concept of boundary is central in this endeavor. When we think of a boundary in the broadest sense, we think of an entity (or event) demarcated from its surroundings. Whether these boundaries reflect the structure of the world or just the organizing activity of our mind is a matter of intense philosophical debate. In this paper, human spatial thinking is a starting point to further explore our interactions with and within our environment. I argue that biosemiotics offers the most suitable framework for doing so, as it integrates humans in the larger communication network flow. Yet the spatial aspect of communication has received only limited attention in the biosemiotic literature. Furthermore, basing myself on my recent crossover practice in art/science, I argue that an embodied-embedded approach is necessary to dissolve and redefine spatial categories, allowing the investigation and potential crossing of the boundaries of our perceptual worlds.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

General Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. BAŞDOĜAN, Ç.; & BOWEN LOFTIN, R. (2009) “Multimodal Display Systems : Haptic, Olfactory, Gustatory, and Vestibular”. In Nicholson, D., Schmorrow, D., & Cohn, J. (eds.), The PSI Handbook of Virtual Environments for Training and Education : Developments for the Military and Beyond, Volume 2 : Components and Training Technologies. Westport, CT : Praeger Security International : 116-134.

2. BINFORD, L. R. (1962) “Archaeology as Anthropology”. In American Antiquity (28)2 : 217-225.

3. BIRNBAUM, D. (2008) The Hospitality of Presence : Problems of Otherness in Husserl’s Phenomenology. New York : Sternberg Press.

4. BOUZY, B. (1995) “Toward Spatial Reasoning about ‘Natural’ Objects”. Online http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.20.512&rep=rep1&type=pdf

5. BROWN, S.; GAO, X.; TISDELLE, L.; EICKHOFF, S. B.; & LIOTTI, M. (2011) “Naturalizing Aesthetics : Brain Areas for Aesthetic Appraisal across Sensory Modalities”. In NeuroImage Journal (58)1 : 250-258. doi : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3