Affiliation:
1. Department of Physics, Astronomy and Geophysics, Connecticut College, Campus Box 5585, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, Connecticut 06320, U.S.A
Abstract
The use of instream structures to modify aquatic habitat has a long history in the United States. Pioneering work by wealthy landowners in the Catskills region of New York produced a range of designs in the decades preceding the Great Depression in an effort to replenish fish populations depleted from overfishing. The scientific evaluation of structures began in 1930. Within two years, a Michigan research team claimed improved fish populations. Cheap labor and government-sponsored conservation projects spearheaded by the Civilian Conservation Corps allowed the widespread adoption of the techniques in the 1930s, before adequate testing of the long-term impact of the devices. The start of World War II temporarily ended the government conservation efforts and prevented the continued evaluation of structures. During the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s, designs of instream structures remained essentially unchanged. Meanwhile, the small number of evaluations of the impact of the structures often were flawed. The continued use of early designs of instream structures helped instill a false belief that instream structures were proven to be a benefit to fish. Even modern use of instream structures continues to rely on the basic blueprints developed in the Catskills, despite documented problems with the use of these designs.
Reference96 articles.
1. Aitken, W.W., 1935. Iowa stream improvement work. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 65: 322-333.
2. Anonymous, 1876. The fish way. Scientific American, 35: 275.
3. ____ 1906. About Kingfishers. Forest and Stream, 67: 338.
4. Armistead, W.H., 1920. Trout Waters: Management and Angling. A&C Black Ltd., London, 195 p.
5. Arthur, M.B., 1936. Fish Stream Improvement Handbook. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C., 33 p.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献