Affiliation:
1. University of Edinburgh
Abstract
In contrast to both behaviourist and cognitive approaches to moral development, neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics has had recent fairly distinctive impact on thought about the practice of moral education. On this view, insofar as moral development is a matter of the cultivation of moral virtues, and virtues are basically qualities of character conducive to good or admirable conduct, virtue formation is reducible neither to behaviour training nor to (mere) intellectual acquaintance with knowledge or principles, and requires essentially practical initiation into the distinctive (Aristotelian) moral wisdom of phronesis. In turn, such focus on the cultivation of practical wisdom has led to large emphasis on the contribution of moral exemplars and role modelling for the moral education of (particularly) young people. This paper argues that such emphasis is seriously overstated, if not wholly misplaced, and that role modelling and exemplification can have only a secondary place at best in any reputable moral educational project or program.
Reference39 articles.
1. Aristotle (1941). Nicomachean ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), Basic works of Aristotle (pp. 927–1,112). New York: Random House.
2. Carr, D. (2005). On the contribution of literature and the arts to the educational cultivation of moral virtue, feeling and emotion. Journal of Moral Education, 34(2), 137–51.
3. Carr, D. (2012). Educating the virtues: An essay on the philosophical psychology of moral development and education. London: Routledge.
4. Carr, D. (2017). Virtue and character in higher education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(1), 109–24.
5. Carr, D. (2021). Where’s the educational virtue in flourishing? Educational Theory, 71(3), 389–407.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献