1. Albert, K. M. (2006). Open access : Implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(3), 253‑262.
2. Archambault, É., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2014). Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996-2013 (Rapport No. D 1.8 version : 11p). European Commission. Repéré à
3. Basson, I., Simard, M.-A., Aubierge Ouagré, Z., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2021). Data sources and their effects on the measurement of open access. Comparing Dimensions with the Web of Science. Dans Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, (pp. 93‑98). KU Leuven, Belgium. Repéré à
4. Beaudry, G., Boucher, M., Niemann, T., & Boismenu, G. (2009). Érudit : Le numérique au service de l’édition en sciences humaines et sociales. Mémoires du livre / Studies in Book Culture, 1(1). Repéré à
5. Björk, B.-C., & Catani, P. (2016). Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals : Does it make a difference ? Learned Publishing, 29(1), 9‑12.