Abstract
Of English writers of the early nineteenth century, none has so sustained and well-documented an engagement with Spinozan metaphysics as Coleridge. Encountering Spinoza's monism both indirectly, through works contributing to the pantheism controversy of the 1790s, and directly, in intensive study of a collected edition of Spinoza's works in 1812-13, Coleridge repeatedly identified the Dutch philosopher with Christianity, particularly in his personal conduct, while deploring the moral implications of his supposed denial of free will. This ambivalent response to Spinoza is reflective of a fundamental and persistent tension in Coleridge's own thought between his attraction to a metaphysical monism, as the basis for postulating the unity of subject and object, and his desire to affirm Trinitarian Christianity.
Reference33 articles.
1. Bayle, Pierre. “Spinoza (Benedict de).” An Historical and Critical Dictionary. 4 vols. London, 1710. 4: 2781-805.
2. Beiser, Frederick. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
3. Bennett, Jonathan. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Ed. Donald Garrett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 61-88.
4. Berkeley, Richard. Coleridge and the Crisis of Reason. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007.
5. Berkeley, Richard. “The Providential Wreck: Coleridge and Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” European Romantic Review 14 (1996): 457-75.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. ‘This Is Not Quite Fair, Master More!’: Coleridge and the Cambridge Platonists;International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées;2019