Affiliation:
1. DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
Abstract
In the past two decades, democratic political practice has taken a deliberative turn. That is, contemporary democratic politics has become increasingly focused on facilitating citizen participation in the public exchange of reasons. Although the deliberative turn in democratic practice is in several respects welcome, the technological and communicative advances that have facilitated it also make possible new kinds of deliberative democratic pathology. This essay calls attention to and examines new epistemological troubles for public deliberation enacted under contemporary conditions. Drawing from a lesson offered by Lyn Sanders two decades ago, the paper raises the concern that the deliberative turn in democratic practice has counter-democratic effects.
Reference42 articles.
1. Achen, Christopher and Larry Bartels, Democracy for Realists, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2016.
2. Ackerman, Bruce and James Fishkin, Deliberation Day, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2004.
3. Ahlström-Vij, Kristoffer, Epistemic Paternalism: A Defence, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
4. Aikin, Scott and Robert Talisse, Why We Argue (And How We Should), New York, Routledge, 2014a.
5. Aikin, Scott and Robert Talisse, “Why We Argue: A Sketch of an Epistemic-Democratic Research Program,” Inquiry, vol. 29, no. 2, 2014b, p. 60-66.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Normative Controversies: Challenges to Apply a Systemic Approach to Deliberation;The Deliberative System and Inter-Connected Media in Times of Uncertainty;2023
2. Introduction;The Deliberative System and Inter-Connected Media in Times of Uncertainty;2023
3. Rationalized and Extended Democracy;Studi e saggi;2023
4. An Ethically Relevant Concept of Democracy;Utafiti;2022-06-24
5. One health ethics;Bioethics;2021-12-12