Constructions of Deafness: Exploring Normalcy and Deviance within Specific Social Representations

Author:

Horejes Thomas P.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Gallaudet University, Washington, USA

Abstract

The constructions of deafness and social representations of a deaf child are very complicated and deeply contested. This paper examines the constructions of deafness and how it has been sociohistorically framed and re-framed within the parameters of normalcy and deviance. Such analysis may offer insight on the potential impact of shaping ideology, politics, and what it means to be deaf. This level of analysis is conducted via an examination of the socio-history of deaf education including discussions of the ongoing “paradigm wars” between certain social control institutions, mainly American Sign Language-based (or called English-based) and the oral-based educational institutions and its implications of language. Examining these two social control institutions will seek to uncover certain constructions within specific social representations and societal dynamics that may shape the deaf child’s identity, its version of “natural” gifts, social inequality, and ultimately the types of ideologies constructed toward deaf students. A possible alternative view of reapproprating of the corporeal differences of deafness is discussed including positive strategies to minimize reproduced social stratification, oppression, social inequality, and divisions when dealing with deafness.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

General Medicine

Reference85 articles.

1. ALTHUSSER, L. (1970). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, Monthly Review Press. Retrieved February 21, 2008. From : http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althuss er/1970/ideology.htm.

2. ARONOWITZ, S., & GIROUX, H. (1991). Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture, and Social Criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

3. ARTILES, A. J. (2003). Special education changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in views of culture and space. Harvard Educational Review, 73(2), 164-247.

4. BAKHTIN, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (C. J. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

5. BANKS, J. A. (1993). The Canon Debate, Knowledge Construction, and Multicultural Education. Educational Researcher, 22, 4-14.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3