Developing Guidelines for Age-Friendly Buses: a Survey of Older Peoples’
Preferences Regarding Headways, Distance to the Bus Stop and Destinations
-
Published:2022-02-28
Issue:3
Volume:19
Page:79-86
-
ISSN:2562-6574
-
Container-title:Développement Humain, Handicap et Changement Social
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:devhumain
Author:
Broome Kieran1, Worrall Linda2, Fleming Jennifer3, Boldy Duncan4
Affiliation:
1. School of Health & Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia 2. School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia 3. School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia 4. Centre for Research on Ageing, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia, Australia
Abstract
Background: Transport providers and policy makers should be guided by research evidence when
developing age-friendly transportation services. There are significant gaps in the literature regarding older
peoples’ preferences for bus headways, distance to the bus stop and destinations. Therefore, the aims of
this study are to 1) quantify the preferred headways for older people, 2) quantify the preferred distance to
the bus stop for older people, and 3) list and rank the preferred destinations of older people. Methods: A
survey of community-dwelling older people in Hervey Bay and Brisbane (both in Australia) was conducted
to quantify the preferences of older people regarding headways, distance to the bus stop and destinations.
Results: One hundred participants completed the survey. The majority of older people preferred headways
of a maximum of 30 minutes during the day and hourly at other times. The preferred distance to the
bus stop was 200m or less. Preferred destinations included cross-suburban travel, leisure destinations,
shops, central business district, medical services and other towns. Conclusion: These results contrast
with usual practice and industry conventions. Transport providers and policy makers who are interested in
providing age-friendly services should attempt to meet these guidelines. They may need to consider innovative
approaches in order to meet these requirements.
Publisher
Consortium Erudit
Reference14 articles.
1. BRAKE, J., NELSON, J. D., & WRIGHT, S. (2004). Demand responsive transport : towards the emergence of a new market segment. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(4), 323-337. 2. BROOME, K., WORRALL, L., MCKENNA, K., & BOLDY, D. (2010). Priorities for an age-friendly bus system. Canadian Journal on Aging, 29, 435-444. 3. DENT, O. F., BROE, G. A., CREASEY, H., WAITE, L. M., CULLEN, J. S., & GRAYSON, G. A. (1999). Transportation needs of community-living older people in Sydney. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 18(4), 186-190. 4. ENOCH, M., STEPHEN, I., LAWS, R., & ZHANG, L. (2006). Evaluation study of demand responsive transport services in Wiltshire (p. 1-99). Leicestershire : Loughborough University. 5. FERREIRA, L., CHARLERS, P., & TETHER, C. (2007). Evaluating flexible transport solutions. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(2), 249-269.
|
|