On The Sustainability Of Urban Institutional Dynamics: Capitalization, Decentralization, And The Case Of Two Alpine Cities

Author:

Church Jon Marco1,Maisetti Nicolas2

Affiliation:

1. Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA, USA

2. Université de Paris 1 – Panthéon-Sorbonne, Centre Européen de Sociologie et de Recherches Politiques de la Sorbonne

Abstract

The focus of this article is on the institutional dimension of urban dynamics, particularly on the twin processes of capitalization – defined as the transformation of a place into a capital city – and decentralization. We observe that they co-exist in several urban contexts. A study was conducted addressing the inherent level of sustainability for each configuration produced by the dynamics. This hypothesis was tested by performing a mental experiment to assess the consequences of the prevalence of one dynamic over the other. To do so, a case study was undertaken on two Italian Alpine cities – Turin and Bolzano – in order to empirically ground the experiment and compare the two conceptual models. From our analysis, both extreme centralization and decentralization seem unsustainable. The broader policy implications are clear: urban institutions must seek to control these processes by avoiding the extremes and mitigating their impacts.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Reference101 articles.

1. AGNEW, J. (1994). “The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory”, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 53-80.

2. AGNEW, J. and J. DUNCAN (1989). The Power of Place Bringing: Together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations, London, Unwin Hyman, 272 p.

3. AMIN, A. (2002). “Spatialies of Globalization”, Environment and Planning C, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 385-399.

4. AMIN, A. and N. THRIFT (1994). Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 288 p.

5. APPADURAI, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Mineapolis, University of Minesota Press, 229 p.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3