Non-Traumatic Bone Marrow Edema of the Knee: Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Comparison to MRI

Author:

Foti Giovanni,Bassi Enrica,Romano Luigi,Iacono Venanzio,Serra Gerardo,Filippini Roberto,Mantovani William

Abstract

Purpose; To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to identify non-traumatic bone marrow edema (BME) of the knee. Methods; This prospective study, approved by the institutional review board, comprised a cohort of 40 consecutive patients (comprising 23 males and 17 females, with a mean age of 52.3 years) who underwent examination using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) with settings of 80 kV and a tin filter at 150 kV, in addition to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), all conducted within 5 days. Subsequently, DECT data underwent post-processing and were evaluated by two experienced radiologists, resulting in the visualization of Bone Marrow Edema (BME) on color-coded maps. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DECT in detecting BME, receiver operator curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were computed, with MRI serving as the reference standard. Interobserver agreement was calculated with k-statistics. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results; At MRI, BME was identified in 30/40 patients, with 106/480 (22,1%) involved partitions. Sensitivity and specificity of Reader 1 were 67,9% (95% CI: 58,2 - 76,7) and 95,99% (95% CI: 93,5 - 97,7), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of Reader 2 were 69,8% (95% CI: 60,1 - 78,3) and 95,99% (95% CI: 93,5 - 97,7), respectively. Similar diagnostic accuracy values were achieved by the 2 readers, with an AUC of 0.82 for R1 and 0.829 for R2 (p=.743). The inter-observer agreement was k=0.68. Conclusions; DECT is an accurate imaging technique for the evidence of non-traumatic BME of the knee when compared to MRI.

Publisher

Savvy Science Publisher

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3