Abstract
It has long been understood by Marxists, including Marx himself, that primitive accumulation was not limited to the historical origins of capitalism. Instead, extra-economic processes of capital accumulation continue to be relevant throughout the subsequent development of capitalism. An examination of the classic analyses of primitive accumulation made by Karl Marx and Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the most significant contemporary interpretation of the concept—David Harvey’s accumulation by dispossession—fails to properly account for the role played by war and military power in capital accumulation today. This is the product of both a problematic interpretation of Marx’s and Luxemburg’s analyses of primitive accumulation as well as a problematic interpretation of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. I argue that Marx and Luxemburg continue to offer a more fruitful foundation from which to address this question.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference44 articles.
1. “Notes on Some Problems of State Interventionism (I).”;E. Altvater;Kapitalistate,1973
2. “Capital Accumulation and the State System: Assessing David Harvey’s;S. Ashman;The New Imperialism,2006
3. “So-Called Accumulation by Dispossession.”;D. Bin;Critical Sociology,2018
4. “Dispossessions in Historical Capitalism: Expansion or Exhaustion of the System?”;D. Bin;International Critical Thought,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献