The impossibility of the triple helix

Author:

Andersson David Emanuel,Andersson Åke E

Abstract

A dynamic model that distinguishes between slow and fast processes shows that a triple helix model is impossible as a tool for promoting interdependencies among science, industry and government. We present a theorem to demonstrate that a triple helix strategy is logically impossible as a means of funding scientific research in universities. In spite of this logical impossibility, national and regional triple helix strategies to improve productivity and innovative capacity have been favoured by politicians of almost every ideological stripe. Coordination of science and industry by governments is not new; it harks back to the mercantilism of seventeenth-century Britain and France. In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, triple helix policies have led to a short-term bias in favour of applied technological research. Several examples, ranging from the military use of scientists in World War II to Chinese high technology parks show how triple helix strategies tilt playing fields, suppress academic freedom0 and expose scientists to the whims of politicians.

Publisher

Pluto Journals

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference41 articles.

1. Å. Andersson, Å. (2011) ‘Creative people need creative cities’ in Andersson, D, Andersson, Å. and Mellander, C. (eds) Handbook of Creative Cities, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.14–55.

2. Andersson, Å., Andersson, D. and Matthiessen, C. (2013) Öresundsregionen: Den Dynamiska Metropolen, Dialogos, Stockholm.

3. Andersson, D., Gunessee, S., Matthiessen, C. and Find, S. (2014) ‘The geography of Chinese science’, Environment and Planning A, 46, 12, pp.2950–71.

4. Birstein, V. (2004) The Perversion of Knowledge: The True Story of Soviet Science, Westview Press, Boulder CO.

5. Broockman, D., Ferenstein G. and Malhotra, N. (2017) The Political Behavior of Wealthy Americans: Evidence from Technology Entrepreneurs, working paper 3581, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto CA.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3