Author:
Cornet Maxime,Le Ludec Clément,Wahal Elinor,Joulin Mandie
Abstract
The transformations brought by the digitisation of work and the emergence of platform labour have deep implications for working conditions. However, researchers face difficulties studying platformised work. Workers’ invisibilisation and the lack of physical co-presence renders field access difficult. How can the variety of platforms, their organisational systems and the working conditions they offer be accounted for? In this article, we propose a mixed-methods methodology to study platforms in all their diversity by articulating the macro level – the market structure revealed through a multiple correspondence analysis – and the micro level – detailed studies of targeted platforms carried out using desk research. We apply this method in two projects, and, in each case, a typology emerges that supports the need for a diversification of the concept of ‘platform labour’ when related to working conditions.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference76 articles.
1. Uber, Taskrabbit, & Co.: Platforms as employers? Rethinking the legal analysis of crowdwork;J. Adams-Prassl;Social Science Research Network,2016
2. Le vocabulaire gouvernemental espagnol (1979–1996);R. Alvarez;Mots,2000
3. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on field instruction and remote teaching alternatives: Results from a survey of instructors;Barton;Ecology and Evolution,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献