Abstract
Beginning with Boeren’s (2018) or Rubenson & Elfert’s (2019) claims of under-recognition of quantitative methodology in adult education, authors use the ecological niche from biology as a metaphorical and heuristic model in order to consider the mechanisms determining the viability of research methodologies in education for adults. The authors discuss ecosystem factors affecting research methodologies and consider the situations of Germany and Canada to illustrate application of the niche metaphor. The conclusion stresses the complementary relevance and integrative value of different forms of research. Addressing diverse questions requires diverse methodologies and a rich ecosystem of resources and research capabilities.
Publisher
Linkoping University Electronic Press
Reference44 articles.
1. American Psychological Association. (2020a). Qualitative Research. https://dictionary.apa.org/qualitative-research
2. American Psychological Association. (2020b). Quantitative Research. https://dictionary.apa.org/quantitative-research
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
4. Bjørnåvold, J. (2001). Making Learning visible. CEDEFOP.
5. Boeren, E. (2018) The methodological underdog: a review of quantitative research in the key adult education journals. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(1), 63-79.