Abstract
Since the 1970s, various aspects of power have been at the focus of theoretical and empirical adult education research. Despite the actual interest in political and discursive aspects of power, this article emphasizes the importance of interactional studies when observing and identifying power based on various types of data. As for German interaction studies, three phases can be distinguished, characterized by a) observations of failed participation based on records of classroom behaviour, b) the identification of mutual power negotiation in classroom and counselling situations based on transcriptions, and c) the identification of the power of physical settings in adult education classrooms and in counselling sessions based on visual data. It is presumed that observing/identifying power in adult education classrooms and counselling sessions generally depends not only on the notions of power underlying the studies but also on the data types produced and the methods applied for their interpretation. In addition, the question is raised whether the identification of power can be considered a power practice used by adult education researchers.
Publisher
Linkoping University Electronic Press
Reference44 articles.
1. Bohn, C. (1991). Habitus und Kontext. Ein kritischer Beitrag zur Sozialtheorie Bourdieus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
2. Lifelong learning and the knowledge economy: those that know and those that do not—the discourse of the European Union
3. Brookfield, S. (2005). The power of critical theory: liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Erziehungswissenschaftliche Videographie
5. Raumbildung Bildungsräume
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Changing the Subject;European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults;2020-03-12