Author:
Stranz Hugo,Germundsson Nora,Hussénius Klara,Bergmark Åke
Abstract
Standardising the Last Welfare Safety Net? RPA-support in Practical Work with Social Assistance in Sweden
In recent years, the use of digital support systems in the administration of Swedish social assistance (SA) has become increasingly widespread. Current surveys show that around 10 percent of Swedish municipalities make use of so-called Robot Process Automation (RPA) in their everyday practice. As key arguments for the use of RPA-support, aspects such as unburdening employees of pure administrative tasks, as well as increased transparency and enhanced legal certainty for applicants, are often highlighted.
The present paper presents results from a larger research project addressing the practical use of RPA-support in Swedish Personal Social Services. The analyses are based on cross-sectional quantitative data from 800 cases collected in four medium-sized Swedish municipalities. Half of the cases reflect assessment outcomes before RPA-support was implemented; the other half show outcomes after implementation. The paper aims, first, to describe the character and contents of the different RPA-tools utilised in municipalities. Second, the paper aims to describe and analyse the outcomes of SA decisions before and after the implementation of RPA-support, respectively.
Our main findings are as follows: (a) while RPA can partially alleviate the administrative burden on social workers, human involvement remains essential for individual assessments; (b) even though the use of RPA-support does not establish any significant relation to the outcomes of SA eligibility assessments, the assessments are far less generous after the implementation of RPA than before; and (c) the changes in generosity are particularly notable with regard to applications outside of the National Benefit Standard, which is a strong predictor for the rejection of applications.
Publisher
Linkoping University Electronic Press
Reference47 articles.
1. Akademikerförbundet SSR (2021) Remissvar: en väl fungerande ordning för val och beslutsfattande i kommuner och regioner. Stockholm: Akademikerförbundet SSR.
2. Andersson, C., Hallin, A. & Ivory, C. (2022) Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: configuring work during automation in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 1–10. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662].
3. Bengtsson, M. (2020) Karriär och profession: om positioner, statushierarki och mobilitet inom socionomyrket. Diss. Lund: Socialhögskolan.
4. Bergmark, Å. & Bäckman, O. (2007) Socialbidragstagandets dynamik: varaktighet och utträden från socialbidragstagande under 2000-talet. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 14(2–3), 134–152. [https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2007.14.2-3.2590].
5. Bergmark, Å. & Stranz, H. (2022) Utilized discretion: a vignette study of social assistance assessments in Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 1–13. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2113863].