Abstract
Ethical analysis may result in recommendations for legal reform. This article discusses the problem of how academic researchers can go from ethical normative judgments to recommendations for law reform. It develops a methodological framework for what may be called ‘ethical transplants’: transplanting ethical normative judgments into legislation. It is an inventory of the issues that need to be addressed, but not a substantive normative theory. It may be especially helpful for Ph.D. students and beginning researchers working in interdisciplinary projects combining ethical and legal analysis.I distinguish three stages in the process from ethics to law: translation, transformation, and incorporation. The latter stage can be divided into three clusters of issues, these being legal, empirical, and normative ones. Most of the philosophical literature on the legal enforcement of morals focuses on the normative issues. My aim is to broaden the perspective in two ways. First, I show that this is only one relevant issue and that we should address legal and empirical issues and the processes of translation and transformation as well. Second, I argue that we should pay more attention to pluralism and variation.
Publisher
Linkoping University Electronic Press
Reference58 articles.
1. Alexy, Robert, ‘The Dual Nature of Law’, Ratio Juris 23(2010), 167-182.
2. Austin, John, Lectures on Jurisprudence (ed. Campbell, R.), London: John Murray, 1885[1863].
3. Baker, Deane-Peter, ‘Making Good Better: A Proposal for Teaching Ethics at the Service Academies’, Journal of Military Ethics 11(2012)3, 208-222.
4. Barton-Crosby, Jennifer, ‘The nature and role of morality in situational action theory’, European Journal of Criminology, (2020) DOI: 10.1177/1477370820977099
5. Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press 1979.