Abstract
The purpose of this text is manifold. The primary purpose is to look into the effects of marketization of academia on the reading habits of academics, which also demands a problematization of reading and its role in the process of creating new knowledge. The second purpose is to discuss and problematize the citation as a sign of intellectual debt. And the third, but not least important, purpose is to write a text that demands the reader to read in a manner that is necessary to learn, instead of writing it in a manner that is adapted to promoting “citability”. And so of course, what I would like more than anything to teach the reader is that the only possible way forward, the only method of reproducing real scholarship in a commodified setting, is to live it yourself. This way of writing a text is my way of living eal scholarship. If this does not agree with you – don’t bother citing me.
Publisher
Linkoping University Electronic Press
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference27 articles.
1. Eli F. Heckschers archive. L 67, Royal Library.
2. ***
3. Andersson, Jenny. The Library and the Workshop. Social Democracy and Capitalism in the Knowledge Age. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2009.
4. Ankarloo, Daniel and Fribergh, Torbjörn (eds.). Den högre utbildningen. Ett fält av marknad och politik. Möklinta, Gidlunds, 2012.
5. Ball, Stephen. “Education for sale? The commodification of everything?” King’s College Annual Education Lecture. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/05/16/42/lecture-ball.pdf, 2004.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献