1. C,/c,jvalue which is about 8.0%less than the positive staggerand singlebase wing configurations at C ,=0.4. It 1 Norton. 1: 11. "ILKectsof Staggeringa Biplane." NACA canbe seen fromthe figure that the difference in et'ticienc\ 'N-7 10.191
2. Changes in Decalage, Dihedral, Sweepback, and Overhand,"NACA TN-325, 1929. Knight,M.andNoyes, R.W."WindTunnel Teston a Series of Biplane Wing Models, Part 111.Effects of Changesof in VariousCombinations of Stagger, Gap, andDecalage,"NACA TN-330, 1929. Nenadovitch,M."RecherchessurlesCellulesBiplane Rigidesd'EnvergureInfie,"Publications Scientifiques et Techniques du Minister de L'Air, Institut Aero' - technique de Saint-Cyr,Paris, 1936. Olson, E.C. and Selherg, B.P. "Experimental Determination of Improved Aerodynamic Characteristics Utilizing Biplane Wing Configurations," Journal of Aircraft, Vol.13, April 1976,pp. 256-261. Rhodes, M.D. and Selherg, B.P. "Benefits of Dual Wings Over Single Wings for High Performance BusinessAirplanes," JournalofAircraft, Vol.21,Feh. 1984,pp. 116-127. Wolkovitch, J , Joined Wing Aircraft, U.S. Patent 3,942,747,1976. Wolkovitch, J. "Subsonic V/STOL Configurations with Tandem Wings," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 16, Sept. 1979,pp.605-611. Wolkovitch, J., Application of the Joined Wing to CruiseMissiles, ONRRept.CR 212-266-1, Contract NO0014-79-C-0953,1980. Samuels, M.F."Structural Weight Comparison of a Joined Wing and a Conventional Wing", AIAA J. Aircraft (19),6,pp.485-491, June 1982. Selberg, B.P. and Cronin, D.L. "Aerodynamic-Structural Optimization of Positive/Negative Stagger Joined Wing Configurations," AIAAIAHSIASEE Aircraft Systems, Design & Technology Meeting, AIAA-86-2626, October 1986. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, "ZON13G-Zonal Interactive Graphics for Grid Generation," October 1991. Ashby, D.L. "PMARC-12-Panel Method Ames ResearchCenterVer. 12.19,"NASA-Arnes Research Center. 1992.