Ground Crash Area Estimation of Quadrotor Aircraft Under Propulsion Failure

Author:

Che Man Mohd Hasrizam1ORCID,Kumar Sivakumar Anush2ORCID,Hu Haoliang2,Huat Low Kin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637460, Republic of Singapore

2. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Republic of Singapore

Abstract

Small unmanned aircraft systems or drones are expected to be used for different applications, such as parcel delivery, inspection, and aerial photography, in urban areas. However, drones usually use an electric system to power up the propulsion, communications, navigation, and flight control system, which means that it is not as reliable as the manned aircraft system and may result in failure during operation and then crash to the ground. At present, there is almost no extensive publication about the high-fidelity modeling used by drones to calculate the crash trajectory and point of crash. The experimental data for modeling and simulation verification of multirotor aircraft are limited. So far, crash trajectory prediction has been limited to point mass or ballistic methods, and these methods are usually only suitable for complete power failure and without any control system. This study intends to investigate the effects of different multirotor drones’ failure modes on its crash trajectory and crash area compared to the ballistic model by using ADAMS and MATLAB cosimulation methods. Conclusions from the study show the crash trajectory, flight distance, and impact speed of the drones under four failure modes, which are quite different from the ballistic trajectory. The findings can potentially contribute to better risk assessment of the multirotor drones for the urban environment operation.

Funder

National Research Foundation, Singapore, and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, under the Aviation Transformation Programme

Publisher

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Energy (miscellaneous),Safety Research,Transportation,Aerospace Engineering

Reference18 articles.

1. “Air Navigation Act (Chapter 6): Air Navigation (101—Unmanned Aircraft Operations) Regulations 2019,” Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, Singapore, 2019, https://www.caas.gov.sg/legislation-regulations/legislation/air-navigation-act.

2. A third-party casualty risk model for unmanned aircraft system operations

3. Third-Party Risk of Mid-Air Collision Between Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

4. D’SouzaK.LyonsT.LacyT.KotaK. R. “Volume IV–UAS Airborne Collision Severity Evaluation–Engine Ingestion,” Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., 2017.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3