Responsive Satellites through Ground Track Manipulation using Existing Technology

Author:

Co Thomas1,Black Jonathan1,Zagaris Costantinos1

Affiliation:

1. Air Force Institute of Technology

Publisher

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Reference22 articles.

1. .1 100 0107 .0 (55) When compared to truth data, this equation has an overall worst average accuracy of 3.7 percent based on percent error after excluding the first 100 points. The accuracy decreases as altitude increases further away from 100 km. Therefore, the 1,500-km case (largest altitude) has the worst accuracy of 3.7 percent for the altitude range. The average error for points 200-300 is 5.6 percent and drops below 1.6 percent after the first 300 minutes and stays below this error for the remainder of time. The ΔV inclusion for this equation becomes problematic as discussed in the nextparagraph.

2. The problem setup of varying the length of time the EP system is firing to achieve a specific level of ΔV does not allow for a simple scaling factor as before. Figure 18 shows the distance curves for three values of ΔV, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 km/s. Since the acceleration of the thruster is set to 1e-6 km/s2, the only way to vary ΔV is by the amount of time the thruster fires. There is no simple expression that can account for the different levels of ΔV since the relationship is very complex. If we use the same ratio method as the previous Section, it will not yield a constant ratio that is suitable as a scaling factor. Figure 18 demonstrates the behavior of distance versus time. The slope continues to increase as long as the thrusters are firing. Once we reach the desired ΔV, the distance continues to grow at the rate of change at the time of thruster shut-off. Instead of finding an equation that accounts for time, altitude, and ΔVforthisproblemsetup, wesimplyleavetheexpressionsasafunctionoftime and altitude forseveral ΔV values. It would be straightforward to develop more equations using the same method as before and code them into an algorithm to determine an approximate ground trackdifference.

3. When compared to truth data, the average accuracy for points 100-200 is 1.1 percent and drops below 1 percent after that. Excluding the first 100 points, this equation has an average accuracy of 1.1 percent. There is no need account for different values of ΔV here since the thrusting period, hence fuel consumption, remains constant between cases. Using this equation, we can very accurately predict the achievable terrestrialdistancesusingEP.

4. ΔV (km/s) 0.01 0.05 0.1 ΔV (km/s) 0.01 0.05 0.1 ΔV (km/s) 0.047 0.107 0.146 Distance (km) 2365 12105 24196 Distance (km) 1735 6540 7945 Distance (km) 2365 12105 24196

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3