Author:
Anastasiya Anatolyevna Azbel,,Leonid Sergeyevich Ilyushin,,Evgenija Sergeevna Samoylova,
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the elements of visual communication presented in the interiors of schools. The lack of textual solutions that meet the emotional and value-based requirements of modern students in the visual space of the school is investigated. Texts in the educational space of the school are a flexible and multifunctional tool that can be used not only to increase the school’s attractiveness but also to create an educational dialog with students and their families. Texts can promote the rules of interaction between people and society, the value of ecological behavior, the effective use of resources, respect for others, and a subjective position in educational activities. Materials and Methods. Photographs and video recordings of the visual environment of modern Russian schools served as material for study. The data was collected not only in classrooms but also in all common spaces of the school – corridors, gymnasiums, canteens, museums, libraries, staircases, and entrance areas. In some cases, the object of analysis included images and texts conveying a specific meaning. Qualitative and quantitative analysis are the main methods used in studying text solutions in educational institutions. The article proposes a classification of visual solutions used in schools (8 types of texts) and describes the group interview method as a research tool for visual solutions in schools. Fixation and attribution of school texts were conducted in interaction with adolescent students. Results and Discussion. The study reveals the content and stylistics of interior elements in modern Russian schools. The article justifies the use of School Texts to develop students’ Flexible Skills. The modern visual environment of Russian schools is largely focused on the preservation of the traditional school system. It conveys a formalized idea of school, in which learning is the main focus rather than other aspects of students’ lives and personal development. Conclusion. In order to develop and implement these solutions, it is useful to combine the efforts of professionals from the fields of design, pedagogy, ergonomic psychology, philology, and linguistics and to listen to the ideas and desires of the main subjects in the educational process – the students themselves. The study results show a lack of professional solutions in the design of modern schools. The article suggests ways to overcome these gaps through a collaborative approach to the design of the visual environment of educational institutions.
Publisher
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Reference36 articles.
1. Cook D.J. Learning Setting-Generalized Activity Models for Smart Spaces. IEEE Intell Syst., 2010, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 32–38. DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2010.112.
2. Sless D. Learning and Visual Communication. New patterns of learning. Kent, Croom Helm, 1981. 208 p.
3. Lola G. N. Dizajn kak kommunikativnaya praktika [Design as the communicative practice]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 15. Iskusstvovedenie – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 2012, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 225–230 (in Russian).
4. Fleming R.L. The art of Placemaking: Interpreting Community through Public Art and Urban Design. London, Merrell, 2007. 383 p.
5. Schneider M. Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes? Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities, 2002. 24 p. URL: http://www.ncef.org/pubs/outcomes.pdf (accessed 19 November 2018).