Abstract
In the context of increasing environmental awareness, the demand for sustainable products is on the rise. This research addresses the growing demand for sustainability by redesigning brooms and dustpans with eco-friendly materials, reducing waste and environmental impact. It emphasizes the goals of enhancing user experience, efficiency, durability, accessibility, and sustainability. A case study investigates the physical challenges faced by street sweepers and underscores the importance of anthropometric considerations in design. The resulting ergonomic redesign significantly reduces workload and musculoskeletal complaints, improving comfort and efficiency. The redesign introduces adjustable handles, lightweight materials, and a 3-in-1 brush system with eco-friendly components. The dustpan features an improved handle, an angled design for efficient debris collection, and a built-in cleaning comb. Both tools are constructed from lightweight yet durable materials and offer a foldable design for user convenience, emphasizing sustainability through eco-friendly materials. In conclusion, this holistic approach enhances the cleaning experience, promoting efficiency, user-friendliness, and environmental responsibility.
Publisher
Peertechz Publications Private Limited
Reference35 articles.
1. 1. The History of Brooms | PHS Hygiene. https://phshygiene.com/industrial-history/the-history-of-brooms/ (accessed Oct. 24, 2023).
2. 2. Berenji J, Dahlberg J, Sikora V, Latkovi D. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench," Economic Botany. 2011; 65:2; 190-208. doi: 10.1007/s12231-011-9155-2.
3. 3. Lowder JB. Broom history: How it became flat 2012. Oct. 24, 2023. https://slate.com/human-interest/2012/06/broom-history-how-it-became-flat.html.
4. 4. Messinger ME, Nowakowski RJ, Prałat P. Cleaning with Brooms. Graphs and Combinatorics. 2011; 27:2; 251-267. doi: 10.1007/S00373-010-0965-2/METRICS.
5. 5. Cocks ML, Dold AP. A new broom sweeps clean: the economic and cultural value of grass brooms in the eastern cape province, South Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods. 2004; 14:1; 33-42. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2004.9752477.