Abstract
It is aimed to gain study substantiality by making an application for risk analysis study in the automotive industry. To bring to the literature the current point of risk analyzes used in FMEA methods applied in the automotive industry. At the same time, it is aimed to improve a problem experienced in the process of an operating in the automotive supplier industry with the risk analysis method. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) from risk analysis which is strong method to identifying and managing of the risks of potential failures occurring from product, process, service and system. Three methods were used in FMEA risk analysis in the study. AIAG FMEA Handbook fourth edition 2008, VDA-4 standard and new generation AIAG&VDA FMEA handbook, 2019. In this study, a Process FMEA study was prepared for the surface coating preparation process used by an automotive supplier industry. According to the results of the risk analysis, corrective actions were defined and prepared after the P-FMEA study. Afterwards, the necessary investments were made by the company management and the risks were minimized. With this investment, an innovative and technological application was integrated by ensuring the transition of the process from the human factor to automation. In addition, differences and current information about FMEA evaluation methods used in the automotive industry have been brought to the literature
Publisher
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Universitesi
Reference41 articles.
1. Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). (2008). Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Reference Manual. Chryesler LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation
2. AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group) and VDA (Verband der Automobilindustrie). 2019. Failure mode and effects analysis – Design FMEA and process FMEA handbook. Southfield, MI
3. Bao, J., Johansson, J. and Zhang, J. (2017), “An occupational disease assessment of the mining industry’s occupational health and safety management system based on FMEA and an improved AHP model”, Sustainability, Vol. 9 No. 1, p. 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010094
4. Bertsche, B. (2008), Reliability in Automotive and Mechanical Engineering: Determination of Component and System Reliability, Springer, Berlin.
5. Carpitella, S., Certa, A., Izquierdo, J., & La Fata, C. M. (2018). A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 169, 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017
Chao.L.P, and Ishii. K., (2007). Design Process Error Proofing: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis of the Design Process”. Journal of Mechanical Design. Vol. 129 Issue 5, pp. 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2712216
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献