Conflicts are parametrically encoded: initial evidence for a cognitive space view to reconcile the debate of domain-general and domain-specific cognitive control

Author:

Yang Guochun1234ORCID,Wu Haiyan5ORCID,Li Qi6,Liu Xun12ORCID,Fu Zhongzheng78,Jiang Jiefeng34

Affiliation:

1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China

2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

3. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

4. Cognitive Control Collaborative, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

5. Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau 999078, China

6. Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA

8. Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Abstract

Cognitive control resolves conflicts between task-relevant and -irrelevant information to enable goal-directed behavior. As conflicts can arise from different sources (e.g., sensory input, internal representations), how a limited set of cognitive control processes can effectively address diverse conflicts remains a major challenge. Based on the cognitive space theory, different conflicts can be parameterized and represented as distinct points in a (low-dimensional) cognitive space, which can then be resolved by a limited set of cognitive control processes working along the dimensions. It leads to a hypothesis that conflicts similar in their sources are also represented similarly in the cognitive space. We designed a task with five types of conflicts that could be conceptually parameterized. Both human performance and fMRI activity patterns in the right dorsolateral prefrontal (dlPFC) support that different types of conflicts are organized based on their similarity, thus suggesting cognitive space as a principle for representing conflicts.

Publisher

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3